Great data point. Were their teaching skills on par with others for their topic? Or at least on par with a typical starting teacher?
Don’t forget we have #5:
Within the limits of such purposes the corporation shall:
- Build and maintain spaces suitable for technical and social collaboration.
- Collaborate on all forms of technology, culture, and craft in new and interesting ways.
- Apply the results of its work to specific cultural, charitable, and scientific causes.
- Freely share its research and discoveries, using what is learned to teach others.
- Recruit and develop talented members dedicated to these purposes.
- Promote scientific, cultural, and artistic advancement
The bottom line on all of this brouhaha is that DMS has rules and guidelines that were interpreted by those enforcing them. These governance items as interpreted and enforced became the fence around the play ground. People played within the fences of those boundaries and generated some unforeseen financial challenges that were brought front and center by a hiccup on membership and cost surprises in expanding. The problem festered longer than anyone wishes it had in significant part due to the cash accounting/no budget operating philosophy of DMS. Now due primarily to the longstanding governance approach of DMS, a perfect storm of troubles got way too close to the shore before it was spotted. So, we hurry around and take protective measure to weather today’s storm, figure out what root causes are and start designing to get them out of the organization.
Consistent with much in human nature, action gets messy because time seemingly must be spent finding people to blame. Maybe, just maybe that’s a waste of time. It appears little has actually been disclosed that reflects players were OUTSIDE the fences. These are fences that organically grew as DMS grew and ended up being not in the best location for today’s needs. It will take some short and long term changes. Most of the changes will help, a few may turn out not to be quite right and have to be modified and tweaked.
IMO opinion, DMS will advance far better and faster if less time is spent finding out who played inside the fences in ways we can’t sustain and strategically focus on getting better fence locations and better tracking of the score so the org has adequate warning when the next surprise rolls upon us … cause it will, we just don’t know when.