Brainstorming potential auto classes on DMS Racing's '95 240sx

I’m beginning to not feel so sure about the lift. I spoke with a member of the board of directors today, and he says the lease strictly prohibits automotive work at all. I feel like, if we got any kind of lift, that might introduce just the kind of liability issue we’d need to get into a lot of trouble with the property owner. Having seen the condition of a lot of the tools around the space (for Christ’s sake, how do you lose the retaining nut for an angle grinder?) I’m fairly convinced that nothing can guarantee the lift doesn’t get abused. Even if nobody gets hurt, the damage a falling car would cause to the floor would be well beyond what I caught heat for today.

All this having been said, my friend and I dabble in paint and body (rather, I dabble; it’s his field of work) and it’d make a good series of classes all unto itself. Of course, painting after doing the body work is pretty much impossible given our situation.

I like the classes proposed, be glad to engage in an assistant role.

If DMS is going to have an auto group, then a lift is a basic necessity, no two ways about it. It’s like asking the electronics group if an oscilloscope is really necessary, or the machine shop if a CNC is a must-have. I do understand the liability and insurance concerns around it, and I don’t agree that you cannot put in process in place that limits the concerns from a safety perspective.

From a legal perspective, it could be something as simple as requiring a member to sign a attached waiver each time they unlock the lift. I race motorcycles, have lost a few friends to the sport, yet see the tracks, promoters, racing organizations and venues continue to operate unaffected. So I find it difficult to believe that an auto lift has the FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt) that others make it to be.

1 Like

It did until we got written permission from the landlord to do automotive related work in order to not be violating the lease. Which is why there was no automotive work for ~6 months after we moved into the new space.

1 Like

Of note, the permission was granted on the condition that we be extremely careful in keeping the floor clean.

If they come in (which they can do for inspections) and see a bunch of oil stains, they’ll tell us to stop automotive work entirely.

2 Likes

Allow me to illustrate a concern.

Imagine a body under there.

For putting a safety process in place and having members adhere to it, the running track record of the Automotive committee is lacking. There is concern about basic things such as a clean space and fluids not being kept off of or cleaned off the floor; we as a group are liable for any damages to the building.

To further a point that there is doubt that any lift-safety process would be adhered to over time, this edit to the Automotive Committee Rules does not build confidence.

In short, absolutely not on a lift. Value of safety and life comes before perceived needs. Even with a solid group the acquisition of a lift is not an easy one.

Note, this is not condemnation of the entire Automotive group. There are good members who are conscientious with their projects. I like how @JayJohnson600 handles his project. I also talked with @DocMitchell5 last night and I am confident we will work through his situation in good faith. But the group as a whole is causing serious concern.

1 Like

Here is a new Oil Stain just this week…

I came into DMS and the owner was not present and was just left like this…

Automotive work inherently deals with oils and brake fluid, both of which are known to stain concrete. While there are no such thing permanent oil stains, the only surefire solution against stains coming to the equation is to simply prohibit any automotive work. Hence the original lease agreement, I’m sure. (As a side note, epoxy coatings are fairly inexpensive and do very well to keep oil from soaking in, but I’m under the impression an epoxy coating is out of the question, based on my conversation with @BenjaminGroves about the existing ESD coating)

I agree with @sunnyt: a lift is a basic necessity if an automotive group is going to exist at DMS, which has a basic focus around education. Simply, education about cars in any real depth is not possible with a car on the ground. There’s no way to get people underneath or at eye level to see the componentry and systems in question. All the same, I agree with the board members: there is no way to guarantee anyone’s safety under a lift here. And this isn’t just an automotive problem, it’s a matter of how people treat DMS tools. The chuck key went missing from the metal shop drill press (despite being tied down to it with a leather strap), and I’ve seen more than my fair share of mutilated tools in my short time here. A lift would be no different. A lift of any sort would be abused, no two ways about it. And unlike an angle grinder with a missing retaining nut, a car misplaced on a lift can really do some damage. Even certified technicians with years of experience have misplaced lift arms. Even excusing the scrawling on the automotive rules chart as a joke, that fact doesn’t build confidence.

Which all brings me to my point: it seems that the automotive committee’s needs are entirely at odds with what we can reasonably accomplish at DMS. There’s no two ways about it, automotive work will spill oil and cause stains, and you can’t much educate people about cars without them on lifts. All the same, the lease prohibits oil spills, and you can’t much trust the average member to put a car on a lift safely. I hate to say it, but it doesn’t seem like this particular focus has much of a place at DMS, for very valid reasons. I wouldn’t want to assume liability for the potential screwups of the other people involved.

Finally, as a side note to @Robert_Davidson, I’ve been with the car every day since I rolled it in. I have had to leave the space to get parts, drain pains, food, and sleep, but I’ve been with the car every minute that other obligations have allowed. Also, the big portion of that fluid that is next to the jack stand and isn’t covered with oil absorbent, was water that spilled out of the exhaust. (The car had been running with a warped head and allowing so much water into the combustion chambers that all 4 cylinders have rusted solid. There was considerable amounts of rusty water in the exhaust) I am taking steps to remove any stains, whether I caused them or not, in the automotive square. As I’ve asserted, there is no such thing as a permanent oil stain. It’s just a matter of drawing the oil out with progressively harsher methods.

4 Likes

So…
Where does this leave us?
With a gutted automotive group, only capable of “tinkering”, rather than making? It seems like peole enjoy the fact that there is a race car, but want nothing more. I suppose that’s OK, but it’s hard to keep automotive folks around if they can’t do their own things, too.
Anyone aware of a way to “spin off” automotive, if there were a way to find a place, to remove “super-dangerous activities” like using a lift to its own space; same organization, but in a dedicated space?
That’s just a thought.
I’ve been dreaming for years now of gathering a group of like-minded DIYers to buy/rent garage space, and fill it with automotive equipment that everyone needs but no one wants to own due to space or monetary restrictions. Sort of a “diy car club”. Instead of being based on a make or model, base it on the fact that we each want to use an alignment rack once a year.
I knew DMS was not going to be all that I was hoping for on that front, but reading some of the “want” threads made me hopeful.
Now it appears fear and beuracracy will crush what little momentum any of those notions may have gathered…
Pity, since pooled resources is really what this should be all about, and automotive crosses over with so many other fields, it is shameful to crush it…

2 Likes

I went ahead and put an item on the next board meeting(March 22nd) to discuss the situation and be sure we are meeting all expectations. There is no reason to despair, the auto area is still open for use and we are exploring options to better protect the floor. Just be sure that everyone keeps the number 1 rule in mind, to be excellent to one another.

4 Likes

@Brandon_Green, is absolutely correct. We need member engagement/communication so we can ensure everyone is on the same page.

1 Like

I am certified to teach auto mechanics in two states. I have been
repairing cars for 45 years, both on a lift and on jack stands. I can tell
you for an absolute fact that working on a car on a lift is vastly safer
than working on a car supported on jack stands and/or ramps. In 45 years,
I have never seen a car come off a lift. I have personally had a car fall
off ramps (being on a creeper saved me).

With all due respect, Ben’s picture is from this site.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCEQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.buzzfeed.com%2Flukebailey%2Fmechanic-problems&ei=_Sn6VM_fGYqZyASYgoLQBw&usg=AFQjCNGVQ7JpTpysTPwsXF87aNQjo5IO-A&sig2=2TqUTmD4Iu1jaNPnHCvbMg
It purports to show extreme cases of “funny” mechanical situations. Even
if the picture is real, the car did not make it to the ground.
Professional shops do not let workers work under a car supported on jack
stands.

A lift would be a very appropriate addition to the Space. What kind of
lift is a very important decision, but I believe that introducing
peripheral issues, like the lease, making a mess (Oh, my; not a mess in a
Makerspace!), and uninformed safety concerns is not productive.

5 Likes

Oil and fluid stains are very easy to avoid. I’ve already planned to bring a tarp to put under my truck when I do my work. There are plenty of options for mats and whatnot that will prevent stains to the concrete. Just a tiny bit of personal responsibility will make staining a non-issue.

1 Like

A tarp is highly non-conducive to anything involving lifting and getting underneath the car. They’re fine for storing a car with leaks, but they’re really no good for working.

Ultimately, unless we can get an epoxy coating, prompt cleanup is the only way to always keep oil from staining. And this isn’t even just Automotive’s problem. Lots of people load and unload leaky cars. Just yesterday there was a Ford conversion van sitting in the shop area being loaded for about an hour, leaking from its oil pan and rear main seals all over the floor. Being as that guy doesn’t work in the automotive field at all, I doubt if he even realized the mess he left behind. (I did clean it up as part of mopping the Auto square last night though) Even if there are stains, though, there are processes to remove them without damaging the concrete. We’ve now got some Tide detergent (which is what they use to clean up oil stains in NASCAR, among others) and for tougher stains I also got some concrete degreaser.

Finally, I do want to add, about safety: that big lathe in the machine shop is just waiting to tangle a man up, the chop saw in the metal shop has no blade guards whatsoever, and I think the big saw in the woodshop doesn’t have a sawstop. All this cheap secondhand equipment is really cool, but there are lots of things in the makerspace that are ready to maim and kill people painfully. While I do think a lift is a tool that could very easily be abused and become dangerous, I do think a lift with mechanical safety locks and 4 frame contact points, which uses a dead-man switch for lowering, is a much safer tool than some of the toys lying around this shop. So, while I do see and agree with both sides of the argument, it does feel like favorites are being played when we let people wearing long sleeves reach into an active, leaking HAAS mill, but say that there will absolutely not be an automotive lift ever.

2 Likes

Chuck called me on that one, and I thank him for keeping me honest.

Regardless of the source web site’s humor angle, I honestly feel the picture stands on its own. The lift device brings an object of approximately 2 or 3 tons up 7 feet in the air. Then people position themselves under it. Without proper safety and process being observed, there is distinct potential for severe harm. Maybe I need to do more research.

I appreciate Chuck’s experience in the auto shop, and his comments above. No buts. Chuck has wisdom. I am going to gather and distil my thoughts for a productive conversation at the next board meeting. I will give thought to Chuck’s statement as I am doing that.

To add to Chuck’s comment, I’ve personally had a vehicle roll off a jackstand when the person helping me released the parking brake while we only had the front end lifted. Fortunately, I wasn’t underneath the car, because its front axle came down and crushed what used to be a 2-ton-rated stand’s base. Not to mention issues I’ve had with jack and stand placement under vehicles that lack sufficient frame strength outside of designated jack points, mostly from getting the vehicle owner’s help lifting the vehicle. It’s to the point where I’ll only ask for help removing jack stands.

The common denominator here isn’t even the jackstands. It’s just as easy to misplace a lift arm as it is to improperly jack a car. The common factor is people who don’t have the knowledge to operate the tools safely. That time with the car rolling off the jackstand was the first time that guy had ever worked on a car. Each time with a misplaced jack has been from the owner lacking familiarity with working on cars.

In summary, working on cars, like anything involving big heavy things that move, can be dangerous. But, with a sense of the risk involved, and the training to use the equipment safely, you can keep all your fingers, as it were. I’m not saying a lift is any kind of do-all-solve-all, or that there’s even any easy way to keep it out of the hands of unsafe operators, just that the danger doesn’t lie in the tools, but their operation.

So I think the question we should be asking isn’t “is that tool safe?” but rather “can we make it so only people who know how to use that tool safely can use it?” And if the answer to that question is “no” then I resoundingly agree with the decision not to acquire a lift. If there’s no way to lock it down for only people who have demonstrated a general sense of competency and regard for safety, it’s better that we don’t have something like that around. I feel the same way about all the dangerous equipment around the space. I want nothing to do with the liability issues the common idiot can bring about.

On that note, some members and I were discussing buying some leg of goat and making video of what some of the tools around the space can do to it. Nothing quite brings a message home like seeing something with the general consistency of human arm get mangled. Of course, this was just some musing over cane-sweetened Dr Peppers, but it is an idea.

In any case, I think, without a lift we are rather limited in what we can teach about cars, and so at least for now, we should focus any efforts on putting together auto classes, on things that can be accomplished with a car on jackstands, since we at least know for sure we can have those.

I wanted to clear up a few point you brought up. First, yes there are many dangerous pieces of equipment at the space. And each has had it’s turn in the fire and has been under scrutiny. As the Board, we are charged with guiding the direction of the DMS and insuring it as safe as we can make it without going off the deep end of encasing members in protective foam.

I don’t think the chances of getting a life are dead, but it’s not something that is decided on quickly and without much thought and perhaps even over thought. When the lathe was brought in and was under repair, we had the same discussions on the very real danger it was to the user and those around it. So please don’t be under the impression that this equipment is being singled out in a process that hasn’t been done before. To be sure, automotive is one of the few activities we do have be mindful of since it’s something the lease required us to get permission to do. So every new activity like this has to be checked and re-checked.

1 Like

I’m sure this has already been considered but is the floor sufficient for a lift?

3,000 PSI concrete and a minimum of 4" thick is standard for automotive lifts.

I assume everything is kosher.

1 Like

I believe Brandon already had the concrete checked for depth and rating, when a 2-post lift was in consideration.

1 Like

On the topic of lifts, acclaimed YouTube educator, Eric the Car Guy, recently had a lift installed in his shop. He just posted a video about it today:

Eric “The Car Guy” Cook is an ASE Master Technician who’s been working on cars professionally since the late 90s, including over 8 years with Acura, and 5 years doing YouTube videos to educate on automotive mechanics. He has literally hundreds of videos covering all sorts of topics from simple brake replacements to how automatic transmissions work, to highly complicated procedures like engine swaps.

2 Likes

Wonder if we could fit this in there?
or this (not so good for endurance racing…)
or this
or this