In the end this case was a defense of freedom of speech. This is the most politically supported idea in America by all major political parties. As no major political party has it at their core the challenging of freedom of speech.
Also, this particular ruling support the freedoms to share information which is a core tenant of DMS from the very start.
The challenging of these core views were the product of apolitical bad bureaucracy. Not a political party as ITAR is not a political group, but a part of the bureaucracy for all political groups while in power.
I feel claiming political victim hood in this matter is being overly sensitive. This is a success for all of us.