You don’t really have a point here except that, rather than discussing things or raising concerns, we have a rant and rave about things that either you clearly don’t understand or were unwilling to bother trying.
Kris was denied chair due to an ongoing thing in the background that needs to be resolved first. The same thing happened with others involved, they were denied certain things until it sorts out.
As for the CTO spot in sorry, but did you raise a concern about migrating the existing chair to the spot back when it happened? Has anyone complained that freddy was appointed to the spot as the existing chair of infra?
Did you raise a concern because if you did it certainly didn’t happen in a way that presented discussion.
This board has been very active and easy to communicate with, it’s no one’s fault but your own if you choose not to do so.
As for the attacks on teachers, we don’t have that problem from the board. We have a cash flow problem. They gave Chairs the ability to make the choice on how to stem the damage
Can’t agree more with Freddy on this one.
You can’t eat your cake and have it too.
That includes you man. I would have just given you respect but you used your goodbye to trash a lot of people for your own opinions.
This was not an answer to anything, purely a rant by you.
FYI, the decision on how to handle classes was left to the chairs, not the BoD. The only requirement was to hit a target for the cash flow problem. Whether it was number of classes, honorarium paid, or enforced fees was left to the chairs
Again, all you bud choosing to try and make this a diatribe.
Kris was denied the position due to the background situation, something you either don’t have the background on or you conveniently choose to omit. Parties that could be considered “the other side” were denied things for the same reasons.
You tried to make this about bashing the board from the get go.