Your never going to get the answer you want on this. It really comes down to it is a mess of a project to deal with. Also, please don’t over state your points by claiming it will all end in the bankruptcy of DMS. That only makes your great point easier to dismiss.
Some history about discipline in our group around tool breakage. We have disciplined members for breaking tools. Types of punishments have been charging for repairs, requiring the retaking of a class, banning from use of tool, banning from use of committee space, and lastly just brow beating the individual ruthlessly.
We don’t try to force payment in most cases for punishment for a few reasons though. First, some of our tools can have repair costs that are just unreasonable for an individual to afford. Second, how do we prove the tool hadn’t already been compromised by the use of others or lack of maintenance. Lastly, the only way we have to easily enforce payment is through threat of expulsion.
But, more important than the punishments is who wields the stick. In the vast majority of cases the committee or committee head is tasked with that job. As they must identify the individual and suggest punishment. If the punishment is more than removing an AD approval or refusing access to committee space, the committee would likely lodge a formal complaint with the BOD to take action against the member.
I hope this all makes since and helps your understanding of both the possible punishments as well as how you can get involved with the committee to help police the use of tools in their committee area.