It is time you dropped it, harping on it is not being excellent
It doesnât matter how many folks chime in to explain the same thing, its still not a rule.
The problem is that this non-rule has not been applied unilaterally. It has been applied to me. If a differing set of rules are to be applied to my classes than the rest of DMS, Iâll pass. This means that a reviewer who had a differing agenda could simply make up a new rule, cancel my class, and make me look foolish, while hoardes rush to support the actionâŚexactly what is happening here.
Either make it a rule and make sure that all classes at DMS follow the rule, enact it on a given date. But since I wrote my class description prior to enactment of said rule this should have never happened. All I can do as a teacher at DMS is look at the rules and follow them. I cannot apply a non-written rule, because it is not there for me to read and follow.
Our first rule is to âbe excellentâ and you are not doing that, what you are doing
is approaching harassment in my opinion
No it doesn t does it? Just make the needed changes and resubmit it
You have been told why and what you need to do and instead your rail and
vent and get very rude to others that don t share your zeal for LabView
You are not following our rules in the way your act, James,
1 Like
5 Likes
Honorarium is granted unless pulled by a director or appointed volunteer within 72 hours of submission.
That is the âruleâ that is being applied. Bill is appointed to approve classes and pulled yours for the reasoning above.
Good luck
3 Likes
Just as an FYI, as much as I hate to wreck your martyr time, you arenât the only person who has had a class pulled because it appeared to be a personal project class.
You know why no one knew about the others? They didnât have a full on tantrum on Talk about it.
9 Likes