And, in an effort to explain why I hate use of the term “reimaging”:
From the advent of the original IBM computers, the school district I worked at was a “PC” centric business. No Macs. I did desktop publishing, photo editing, illustration, etc. on a PC. Which was Okey-dokey. Until it wasn’t.
Sadly, the IT leadership adopted a “one size fits all” policy when it came to the systems. I was one of the first seven people to get a PC. A cutting edge system when it was assigned to me, it quickly showed its’ limitations. Then they started rolling out more systems to other administrators and secretaries. Cool, right? Except, despite the fact that everybody else was running word processing programs vs. the heavy-memory-using graphics programs I was using, they got more powerful systems, while I was left with my very rudimentary system. Requests for upgrades were met with “well, they don’t have anything, so they get the new computers. You’ll be upgraded after everyone else has gotten theirs.” (bangs head on desk repeatedly).
Eventually, I did get an upgraded system, and even a laser printer (woot!), but now with a lot of PCs out in the field with a lot of clueless, resistant, or over-confident users out there, there were a lot of breakage problems. So the next “one-size-fits-all” decision was that when a PC developed a problem, the solution was to re-image the hard drive.
That is a logical solution IF everyone is using the exact same software, and all of their information can be backed up to a few floppy disks. However, in my case, I eventually had multiple megabytes of data for complicated projects saved on my hard drive - that they did not really make floppy disks large enough to backup, and they did not provide any usable quantity of remote storage space via the network. Having my computer go down with a problem was a BIG PROBLEM, because reimaging my hard drive meant losing many hours of work on many complicated design projects.
When I was at the end of my rope, we had a new finance guy join the district who was a Mac guy. And he refused to be a PC user. The business office found some unencumbered money that they decided should be funneled toward migrating me to a Mac platform, to overcome the “we need to reimage your hard drive” problem.
So, in summation, the term “reimage the hard drive” is a term that really makes my blood boil. And the reason I don’t want to hear it. I embrace the fact that it is often the best solution when a hard drive has been loaded with too much crap (which even a rube like me can tell is the case with the digital room systems), and am also peripherally aware that the Infrastructure gang has developed a “standard burn” for the initial image of a hard drive that is being launched somewhere in the space. But calling it “reimaging” immediately leads me to the conclusion that somebody is trying to coax an old inadequate setup into being something it is not.