I’m running into a problem with a registration pattern where I want to promote a class on two independent platforms (in this case, Meetup.com and the DMS calendar). I have tried directing registrations on both platforms to Eventbright, but potentials on Meetup.com appear to be less likely to use an outside platform, especially if the class has a fee.
I have recently tried splitting a $5 dollar per seat paid registration between Meetup.com and the DMS calendar. This is a 3-hour, 20 seat interactive class on Google Cloud IaaS that I will present in the Lecture Hall. I divided up registration so that Meetup.com was open to 10 paid signups, and the DMS calendar was open to 10 paid signups. I directed people to use the payment system for each corresponding platform. Registration on Meetup.com filled up immediately. The registration on the DMS calendar has only had a few signups. Of the 10 seats listed on the DMS calendar, 7 are still empty, even though the class is tomorrow night.
I have deployed split registration with several free events and had similar results. 2-3 people show up that used the DMS calendar, but registration on Meetup.com fills up quickly. The day before the event, I end up increasing the maximum registration limit on Meetup.com and hope that nobody else signs up on the DMS calendar so that I’m not overcapacity.
The DMS calendar does not appear to have a way to retroactively change the registration limit of a scheduled class once the class has been submitted.
For my next class, I was thinking about skipping DMS calendar registration altogether and have people from DMS sign up directly on Meetup.com to see what happens.
Maybe others in less technical subject areas have had different experiences, but this has been my experience, so far. I’m reaching out because I don’t want to overlook the marketing knowledge of other teachers who have taught non-honorarium classes at DMS. At the very least, I’d like to facilitate a useful discussion. Does anyone have a suggestion for an alternate registration pattern that is more ideal?